Program PDF
(click on cover)
(click on cover)
schedule
(Click on the documents)
Regards de femmes
on an original idea by Nora Bashir and François Costes, the documentary settles around themes such as transmission, education, religion ...
Evening Global Justice
Thursday, March 25 8:30 p.m.
session followed by a debate by Fabrice AUBERT, economist,
responsible UGICT CGT-13
The Shock
Michael Winterbottom and Matt Whitecross
England, 2010, 1:20
From the book by Naomi Klein
2007, Naomi Klein The Shock released. A collective trauma, a war, a coup , natural disaster, terrorist attack dive every individual in a shock. After shock, we become again children, now more inclined to follow leaders who claim protect us. If there is one person who understood very early that phenomenon is Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976. Friedman, arguing ultraliberalism, advised politicians to impose immediately after a crisis painful economic reforms before people had time to recover.
He called this method of shock treatment. Naomi Klein calls it "strategy shock." Using many archival images, Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross demonstrate the power of the text by Naomi Klein and the need to resist.
"What guided us throughout the creation process is that first of all, we wanted make a documentary that makes sense for the younger generation. My daughter just turned 18 and now has the right to vote. In adopting its look, we tried offer insights relevant to the current situation. The film in its form and its rhythm is the result of a long process of archival research on the one hand and articulation between a narrative and public interventions Naomi other. "
The Shock Doctrine published in 2007 and tackles what Naomi Klein calls disaster capitalism. For her it is obvious that this rogue capitalism benefits from lower natural disaster, assassination, coup, political upheaval, economic or social, to impose radical economic reforms. The general stupor following these disasters are utilized to dramatically reduce the prerogatives of the state, make deep cuts in spending Social and leave the field open to multinationals in their capture of wealth, exploitation of labor and alienation of the consumer.
She explains this process in this three-part video interview given by The Free TV in 2009
Thursday, March 25 8:30 p.m.
session followed by a debate by Fabrice AUBERT, economist,
responsible UGICT CGT-13
The Shock
Michael Winterbottom and Matt Whitecross
England, 2010, 1:20
From the book by Naomi Klein
2007, Naomi Klein The Shock released. A collective trauma, a war, a coup , natural disaster, terrorist attack dive every individual in a shock. After shock, we become again children, now more inclined to follow leaders who claim protect us. If there is one person who understood very early that phenomenon is Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976. Friedman, arguing ultraliberalism, advised politicians to impose immediately after a crisis painful economic reforms before people had time to recover.
He called this method of shock treatment. Naomi Klein calls it "strategy shock." Using many archival images, Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross demonstrate the power of the text by Naomi Klein and the need to resist.
"What guided us throughout the creation process is that first of all, we wanted make a documentary that makes sense for the younger generation. My daughter just turned 18 and now has the right to vote. In adopting its look, we tried offer insights relevant to the current situation. The film in its form and its rhythm is the result of a long process of archival research on the one hand and articulation between a narrative and public interventions Naomi other. "
The Shock Doctrine published in 2007 and tackles what Naomi Klein calls disaster capitalism. For her it is obvious that this rogue capitalism benefits from lower natural disaster, assassination, coup, political upheaval, economic or social, to impose radical economic reforms. The general stupor following these disasters are utilized to dramatically reduce the prerogatives of the state, make deep cuts in spending Social and leave the field open to multinationals in their capture of wealth, exploitation of labor and alienation of the consumer.
She explains this process in this three-part video interview given by The Free TV in 2009
***************
******
*** *
CINE / BISTRO / PHILO
Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 18:30
Debate Buffet, Buffet projection Participation Fee: EUR 3 In partnership with: MJC, Mediatheque Louis Aragon and the bookstore Paragraph Martigues
Evening presented and moderated by: Vladimir Biaggi and Benedict Spinoza (philosopher)
Our Republic is secular: this principle has imposed not without difficulties and it continues to generate criticism - perhaps marginal - is meant.
After reviewing some of the arguments opposed to the secular ideal, Benedict Spinoza and Vladimir Biaggi will try to establish that secularism is a belief among many others (some speak of "secular religion"!) But that it offers one of the conditions of living together with our beliefs ... and despite our beliefs .
After reviewing some of the arguments opposed to the secular ideal, Benedict Spinoza and Vladimir Biaggi will try to establish that secularism is a belief among many others (some speak of "secular religion"!) But that it offers one of the conditions of living together with our beliefs ... and despite our beliefs .
Day skirt
From the outset, this tension is almost tangible. It is perceives in the clumsy gestures of a weary-faced woman, who tries to break through the middle of rowdy teens - its students. The French class starts late and in chaos. And then a gun fell from the bag a small boss. A bout of fear and exasperation, Sonia Bergerac (Isabelle Adjani, perfect) picks up the gun and turns the kids (too well) that have done so much to see. As the pressure increases outside the room where she keeps the students, the teacher becomes a vigilante. Racism, religion, machismo, all these heavy things and taboo are spread over the table, for better or for worse ... Strange film, on the edge, deliberately incorrect and remarkably well written. If the first accents are those of the corrosive comedy, about the inexorable drift toward tragedy.
Day of the skirt is not (that) a bittersweet chronicle of violence in schools. It is a fable successful on all these fears are rooted in the everyday and that you get used to, dare to care for lack of roots, then they can only lead to a social disaster and human . Sophie Bourdais
Day of the skirt is not (that) a bittersweet chronicle of violence in schools. It is a fable successful on all these fears are rooted in the everyday and that you get used to, dare to care for lack of roots, then they can only lead to a social disaster and human . Sophie Bourdais
The s we have enough in these times when public space is saturated with "niqab" and "Burqa"? The word "skirt" comes from the Arabic word "djoubba" which means a kind of dress that the prophet would have brought something like "jacket below.
Irony etymologies because today the skirt and the "niqab" not only have forgotten their common origins, but without cross dating. It would be easy to portray the field of French feminism in the early 20th century as a battle between supporters of the right to wear the skirt and those of the right to wear the veil.
Ironically now, the skirt has long been criticized for an indication of submission to male desire. Remember that one time he had to ask permission to wear trousers, George Sand herself had to comply.
Also the current reversal is it really surprising: the return of some sexism in the playground down the buildings as sometimes instructed young women to cover their legs. To not be open to ridicule or insult, it is better to avoid the signs of femininity that you designate as a "slut."
feminists have always said they are fighting for equal rights, not to wear pants. But equality does pass by wearing the skirt?
Irony etymologies because today the skirt and the "niqab" not only have forgotten their common origins, but without cross dating. It would be easy to portray the field of French feminism in the early 20th century as a battle between supporters of the right to wear the skirt and those of the right to wear the veil.
Ironically now, the skirt has long been criticized for an indication of submission to male desire. Remember that one time he had to ask permission to wear trousers, George Sand herself had to comply.
Also the current reversal is it really surprising: the return of some sexism in the playground down the buildings as sometimes instructed young women to cover their legs. To not be open to ridicule or insult, it is better to avoid the signs of femininity that you designate as a "slut."
feminists have always said they are fighting for equal rights, not to wear pants. But equality does pass by wearing the skirt?
*************** ******* ***
*
The Sweets of the Month:
SHORTS
The Big Shave (1967) Martin Scorsese
Canta Gitano (1981)
Tony Gatlif
Two Men and a Wardrobe (1958)
Roman Polanski
***
0 comments:
Post a Comment