Leptospirosis 4-way Vaccine Side Effects

Adventure Young Turk: Contents

Table of contents:

Introduction

Part I: The context of their appearance

Part Two: In Opposition

Part Three: In power

Part Four: Latest fighting

Conclusion

bibliographic sources

Japnese Students Kissing

Adventure Young Turk: Bibliographic Sources

Previous: Conclusion


bibliographic sources


French:

Books

- Pierre Loti, dying Turkey (1913).

- Pierre Loti, The death of our beloved France in the East (1920).

- Rudolf von Sebottendorff, operative practice of ancient Turkish Freemasonry (1974).

- Francis Georgeon, The origins of Turkish nationalism: Yusuf Akçura, 1876-1935 (1980).

- Francis Georgeon, Abdulhamid II (2003).

- Bernard Lewis, Islam and secularism . The birth of modern Turkey (1988).

- Georges Maleville, The Armenian tragedy of 1915 (1988).

- Robert Mantran (edited by), History of the Ottoman Empire (1989).

- Robert Mantran, History of Istanbul (1996).

- Thierry Zarcone, Mystics, philosophers, and Freemasons in Islam (1993).

- Thierry Zarcone, Turkey. Of the Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Atatürk (2005).

- Dimitri Kitsikis, Empire Ottoman (1994).

- Salah Jmor, The origin of the Kurdish question (1994).

- Jean-Louis Triaud, The black legend of the Sanusi. A Muslim Brotherhood Saharan Africa under the French viewpoint, 1840-1930 (1995), Volume II.

- Jean-Paul Roux, Central Asia. History and Civilization (1997).

- Jean-Paul Roux, History of the Turks (2000).

- Antoine Constant Azerbaijan (2002).

- Serge Métais Albanian History (2006).

- Odile Moreau, The Ottoman Empire at the age of reform. Men and ideas of the "New Order" military 1826-1914 (2007).

- George Mamoulia, Caucasian separatists fighting between Soviet and Western powers: The case of Georgia 1921-1945 (2009).

Articles:

- P. Risal (pseudonym of Tekin Alp), "The Turks in search of a national soul," Mercure de France , August 16, 1912.

- Dimitri Kitsikis, "Nationalism in the Balkans: a comparative study of revolutions of 1908 Turkish and Greek in 1909," Historical Papers, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1971.

- Dimitri Kitsikis " Nationalism, "International Studies , vol. 2, No. 3, 1971.

- Paul Dumont, "The journal Türk Yurdu and Muslims of the Russian Empire, 1911-1914," Cahiers of the Russian and Soviet , Year 1974, Volume 15, Number 3.

- Paul Dumont, "The fascination of Bolshevism: Enver Pasha and the Party of Soviet popular, 1919-1922," Cahiers of the Russian and Soviet , Year 1975, Volume 16, Number 2.

- Georgeon Francis, "The rise of Turkish nationalism in the Ottoman State (1908-1914). Review and Prospects ", Journal of Muslim West and the Mediterranean , No. 50, 1988.

- Georgeon Francois, "Note on Modernism in Azerbaijan at the turn of the century," Cahiers du Russian world: Russia, Russian Empire, Soviet Union, Independent States, Vol. 37, No. 1-2, 1996.

- Ozay Mehmet, "The Turkish-Armenian tragedy, 1915, International Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1989.

- Gilles Veinstein, "Three questions about a massacre," History, Number 187, April 1995.

- Stéphane de Tapia, "Refugees in the construction of the Turkish nation-state," Elsewhere , Volume 7, 1998.

- Prevelakis George, "The process of ethnic cleansing through time," world wars and contemporary conflicts , January 2005 / 217.

Communication:

- Jean-François Bayart, "From Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Turkey: the temptation colonial" Orientalism disoriented? Turkey mirror contemporary postcolonial approaches , Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Rennes, 28-29 January 2010.


English:

Books

- Justin McCarthy, Muslims and Minorities : The Population of Ottoman Anatolia and the End of the Empire (1983).

- Justin McCarthy, Death and Exile : The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922 (1996).

- Kemal Karpat, Ottoman Population, 1830-1914, Demography and Social Characteristics (1985).

- Kemal Karpat, Ottoman past and today's Turkey (2000).

- Kemal Karpat, Studies on Turkish politics and society : selected articles and essays (2002).

- Jacob M. Landau, Tekinalp, Turkish patriot, 1883-1961 (1984).

- Jacob M. Landau, Pan-Turkism : from irredentism to cooperation (1995).

- Jacob M. Landau, Exploring Ottoman and Turkish history (2004).

- Alija Izetbegovic, Izetbegovic of Bosnia-Herzegovina : notes from prison, 1983-1988 (1992).

- Şükrü Hanioğlu, The Young Turks in opposition (1995).

- Şükrü Hanioğlu, Preparation for a revolution : the Young Turks, 1902-1908 (2001).

- Erik Jan Zürcher, Turkey : a modern history (2004).

- George Walter Gawrych, The crescent and the eagle : Ottoman rule, Islam and the Albanians, 1874-1913 (2006).

- Olivier Roy, The new Central Asia: Geopolitics and the birth of nations (2007).

Article:

- Ensar Yilmaz, "Ziya Gökalp's political sociology", International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology , Vol 2 (3), March 2010.

Communication:

- Erik Jan Zürcher, "The Late Ottoman Empire as the Laboratory of Demographic Engineering ', The multilingual regions such as fault and the motor of European history in the nineteenth-twentieth century , Naples, 16-18 September 2008.


En allemand:

Livre:

- Tekin Alp, Türkismus und pantürkismus (1915).


The anglais:

livres:

- Talaat Pasha, Talat Pasha's homesickness Memories sadrıazâm Martyr (1983).

- Jamal Pasha, Memories (2006).

- Ziya Gökalp, Principles of Turkism (1970).

- Munis Tekinalp, Kemalism (1936).

- Ayse Osman, Abdhülhamid Father (1960).

- Aaron Velidi Togan, Memories: East Turkestan, Turks and other Muslims of National Assets and Cultural Challenges (1969).

- Kamuran Gurun, The Armenian File (1985).

- Sukru Hanioglu, as a political organization of the Ottoman Committee of Union and Progress Party and Jon Turkish (1986).

- Hasan Kayali, Arabs and Young Turks : Ottomanism the Ottoman Empire, the early Arab nationalism and Islamism, 1908-1918 (1998).

- Kemal Karpat, for political Islam (2001).

- Fuat Dündar, the Committee of Union and Progress Muslims Settlement Policy, 1913-1918 (2002).

- Fuat Dündar, Password Modern Turkey: Ethnicity Engineering Union and Progress, 1913-1918 (2008).

- Jamie Bardakci, Talat Pasha Briefcase-i Metrukesi (2009).

Penis Electro Turture

Adventure Young Turk: Conclusion

Page precedente: Derniers combats


Conclusion

La Révolution de 1908 a bousculé une société de manière bienfaisante ottomane paralysée et par le conservatisme incongru incapacitant d'Abdul Hamid II. Elle a certes échoué à sauvegarder un ottoman empire which was already in tatters and plagued by foreign interference. The

Turkish nationalism emerged and said later: he was a defensive reaction against the salutary Christian nationalism based on ethnic-religious cleansing , the minority stranglehold on the economy , to Russian expansionism and Western colonialist appetites. In 10 years in power , the Young Turks were facing 6 years of wars, which 4 of a World War : difficult therefore remain temperate.

By great Young Turk revolution, the Turkish people became aware of itself as a nation , affirmed its right to exist, its aspiration to life. "They" did not accept that Turks have a empire, "they" did not accept they have a more nation-state in Anatolia . And if it is for this precise reason that this revolution is covered with a cartload of slander and gossip today, especially today?

As for us, after so long exposed, we wish to pay tribute, with emotion and gratitude to these revolutionary , these brave patriots , these heroes a word, and the work accomplished. We salute their memory with dignity, while also experiencing the most profound contempt for their numerous enemies (which are also the enemies of the Turks ), especially when it is so frowned upon the do.

live the Fatherland! Long live the nation! Long live Freedom!


Next: Bibliographic Sources

Will An Iron Gym Break Your Door Frame?

Adventure Young Turk: Latest fighting

Previous: In power


Part Four: Latest fighting


Minutes policies against the Young Turks

The Allied occupation of Anatolia and began in Istanbul November 1918. The government Mehmet VI was under the thumb of the Allies.

Courts in Istanbul, convened by the English, condemned in absentia Enver, Talat and Cemal and sentenced to death in July 1919 (which is reminiscent of humiliating setbacks Baathist leaders in occupied Iraq by the Anglo-Americans). Other convictions Young Turk leaders were held in 1919-1920 . Parenthetically, the Allies also intended to try German leaders: they have vainly tried to drag a court Wilhelm II refugee in Holland, and organized a trial of "war criminals" in Leipzig. It is unclear whether it should laugh or cry, as their late ally Tsarist Russia was the primary responsibility for the conflagration of 1914 (unconditional support for the nationalist Serbian hysterical against Austria-Hungary ) and had ruthlessly massacred Muslims in the Caucasus and Anatolia . Even if she really wanted to UPC for the disastrous outcome of the war, public opinion rejected as biased this "justice". The accusations proved such a farce that English themselves as British high commissioner SAG Calthorpe , eventually discredit the courts: as if the slave was going far too crass to please the master. The English did not use, by distrust, questionable documents collected during these trials to judge the Young Turks (Including Gökalp ) held in Malta .

Talat (killed by the Armenian terrorism to Berlin in March 1921 ) and Cemal (killed in the same way in Tiflis July 1922) vigorously defended themselves in their posthumous memoirs , pointing the finger, rightly, the vain hypocrisy of Western propaganda that has found nothing wrong with the fate of the Muslims Balkans and Caucasus (for a century), and that of the Turks and Kurdish Anatolia fallen into the hands of Armenian terrorist gangs and mercenaries (often also Armenians) from the Russian army .


tactical alliance with the Bolsheviks

Let us Enver Pasha on . The photographs show a man with hard eyes, but calm, unruffled face pale, the groomed mustache, always elegant. This "great man", this "charming boy" (27 years at pronunciamento of 1908, 32 years old when the coup of 1913) as not hesitate to call Jean-Paul Roux , was a leader extraordinary, with the imposing and impressive personality. Admirer of Napoleon , he had a strong desire to change things, to precipitate the course of history, convinced he had a destiny. Heroes of the Revolution of 1908 " Champion of Freedom" won the battle Edirne (1913), it was shows an undeniable courage, bordering on up- extremism, as Kemal, but he was less measured in its decisions. Hyperactive, he seemed always in motion, fighting, always fighting. Devout Muslim, he prohibited officers to attend the cabarets, they recommended to follow up with religious requirements of Muslim soldiers and non-Muslims, he burst into tears during a pilgrimage to Medina alongside Cemal (also within the scope a strong emotion).

In exile (in Germany at Moscow), Enver sought logistical support from the Bolsheviks. The revolutionary Lenin had tried at first to coax the Muslims: it has been thought in part to their speeches, or at least see them as less worse than the czarist. In his correspondence, Enver evoked a sort of "Islamic socialism" and the action of a network of pan-Islamist revolutionary societies, envisioned the organization of battalions manned by Muslims the Red Army to liberate the Anatolia and eventually reconstitute the Ottoman Empire confederal form. He attended the Baku Congress (September 1920), where he met Galiev Sultan, a Communist who wish to marry Tatar Bolshevism and Pan-Islamism (he was later a victim of Stalinism). In his statement read Congress, spoke to Enver Development Progressive (including education), revolt of the oppressed people. In

February 1921, he sent his uncle Halil Paşa to Trabzon to the agitprop, not without success, until the response of the Kemalist who put him outside. A summer the same year, Enver performed the reverse of the Kemalist resistance against the Greek army as an opportunity to return in triumph in Anatolia (assuming also taken very seriously by the Agreement ): he watched from the timing Batumi , along with other exiles Unionists (including Dr. Nazım ), then abandoned the project upon learning that the Kemalist finally fell head. Compared to his old rival Kemal Enver was now little weight with Moscow .

At the same time, Cemal worked to modernize the Afghan army in the emirate of Amanullah Khan .


Enver Central Asia

There was a Muslim reformist movement ( djadidism ) active in the Russian imperial ( Congress Muslim 1906), especially among the Kazan Tatars . A movement of Muslim guerrillas had appeared in 1916 to Turkestan: the basmaci . Since the fall of 1921 , Enver, insightful, was now convinced that Bolshevism was a continuation of Russian imperialism enslaving Muslims. A Bukhara in October 1921 he found Zeki Togan Velidi (former chairman of Revolutionary Committee Bashkir of 1919-1920, he took refuge in Turkey where he became Turkologist) he had already met Moscow and Baku Congress disappointed also of Bolshevism: the latter advised him to go to Afghanistan .

Enver finally joined the basmaci Turkestan ( November 1921). Prestige (from Ottoman general , husband of a princess of the House of Osman ) from Muslim fighters was very large. Led by Enver and other former Ottoman officers, the resistance of basmaci enjoyed victories at first, as playing on the element of surprise. What epics then occupied the dreams of Enver in this fascinating land Central Asia? Those Timur / Tamerlane and Babur he (the Turkism in whose veins the blood ran Gagauz )? that Alexander the Great (him, the flamboyant officer Macedonia)?

The swords in a final cavalry charge, he was shot in August 1922 by a detachment of Red Army .

Thus, somewhere in the steppe of Tajikistan current , died at age 41 the hero of the Revolution of 1908 . If the company

ultimate Enver had succeeded, it might be avoided by extension the martyrdom of many Muslims under the Stalinist yoke:
- 1.7 million Kazakhs killed in 30 years;
- deportations of 400,000 Chechens-Ingush , the 160,000 Crimean Tatars, the 100,000 Meskhetians, the 60,000 Karachay, Balkar of 30,000, Kurds Caucasus ( 1943-1944).

The existence of a large unified whole Turkish-Muslim Central Asia would also have prevented the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan , and therefore death 1, 2 million Afghans (including 80 % of civilians ).

Poor Enver who has spent his entire short life fighting as a brave soldier of Islam ( Macedonia, Libya, in Thrace, the Caucasus, Central Asia ), because the noble soul his ancestors Oğuz commanded him to do and not to any selfish calculation, while many other Muslims did not have his courage and planted their shameless coward's knife in the back of the Ottoman army in alliance with his worst enemies. It would fall from the clouds, seeing everything moult idiots dare dump on her now, calling him a "Zionist" to "Agent Illuminato-Masonic" and "crypto-Jew" and many other things, their imbecility "happy" feeding on itself by its unfathomable void. Never mind, he saved his honor and died with dignity: it is essential.

For our part, we do not feel entitled to blame the choice of Enver (alliance with Germany and rapprochement with the Bolsheviks ) because our firm belief is that he boldly maneuvered without ceasing be a good Turk, who never left his eyes the place in the sun he dreamed for his people, always wanted the best for him. He exposed himself, he played a lot and he lost a lot. Too bad for him, but also damage to the Turks. It is with humility, understanding and sincere respect that we bow before the greatness of this man, whose handsome voluntarism as contrasted with the reign of the deleterious hypocritical Abdulhamid II .


burst Kemalist

It may seem surprising endurance Muslims in Anatolia 1919: they had known from 1911 to 1918 , 6 years of wars and all cruel lost (if not the Second Balkan War). Yet they found strength and determination to fight even when War of Independence from 1919 to 1923 : the survival instinct guided them, they resisted fiercely in a final war, a war for the National Liberation .

Countless Kemalist were former Young Turks. This was obviously not the rabble of "old turbans" Liberals and was going to fight for the liberation of Anatolia them légumifiés by fatalism, preferring prostitution to the occupier abroad, good patriots could not find at home. In

June 1919, Mustafa Kemal Paşa launched a call for the convening of a national convention for the salvation of Turkey. In response, he was removed from office by the military Sultan. In September , Kemal backed two national conferences (in Erzurum, Sivas and then), became the leader of a national government opposite to the traitors Istanbul. It was the beginning of Revolutionary War . In April 1920 , Assembly national meeting in Ankara legitimized the power of Kemal.

Mehmet VI condemned the nationalism of Kemal as "impious" interesting use of "arguments" fundamentalists to make the game of the occupier ... The Kemalist

had to face armed English and French to the "Army of the Caliph 'Mehmet VI, the Greek army and Dashnak . Almost the whole world fell over them. Many enemies, much honor, you say ...

The Treaty of Sèvres (August 1920) inflicted by the Agreement and accepted with the traitor Mehmet VI provided: an Armenian state in provinces of Van, Erzurum and Trabzon a "autonomy" Kurdish a Greek annexation of eastern Thrace and the region of Izmir , areas of Italian influence (near Konya), French (Cilicia) and UK (Southeast), the demilitarization of the periphery of the Marmara Sea, only a portion of central Anatolia (region Ankara) was left to the Turks. Kemal rejected this treaty with the utmost vigor.

Can you blame him for having once arranged with the Russian Bolsheviks a friendship treaty (March 1921) that allowed his troops to rearm? It would be unbecoming of a presumption. The German military Weimar did the same ( Treaty of Rapallo of 1922 ), not later than the relations of Nasserist and Baathist Arab with USSR during the Cold War (for the same reasons logistical and diplomatic). In addition, Armenians would be very poorly placed to condemn this treaty, given the collaboration with Dashnaks Baku Soviet against the Azeri population . From the beginning, Kemal emphasized the ideological separation between his nationalism and communism . Kemalist Turkey and was a valuable place of refuge for anti-Turkic ( Velidi Zeki Togan, Mehmet Emin Resulzade ).

In Republic headed by the Armenian Dashnak (1918-1920), extending from Caucasus to Anatolia the Armenians continued their treatment of Muslims (" Armenise " on behalf of the "Great Armenia "), with massacres, like the Oba village in the province of Igdir ( 1918). In September 1920 , Kemalist military forces swept the Armenian Republic in Anatolia . In December by the Treaty of Alexandropol , Armenians ( invaded by the Red Army in November ) Kars-Ardahan went to Kemal. The French

had seen fit to use a " Armenian Legion" in Cilicia, they were themselves surprised and embarrassed at the level of savagery of the Armenian volunteers towards the Muslim population. From May 1920, the Kemalist held in check the French in Cilicia.

In May 1919 , the Greek army, worked by the Megali Idea , invade Izmir with the endorsement of English . The Greeks received the support of Armenians of the city (which had not been transferred, remember) to commit atrocities against Muslims. In September 1922, the Kemalist army resumed Izmir. The Kurds

joined the Patriots Turkish, and they were right: their brothers northern Iraq held by the English were victims of repression Assyrian auxiliaries of the Assyrian Levies and of bombings (including mustard gas ) of the Royal Air Force (that's what was hiding the "autonomy" of the Kurdish Treaty of Sevres), especially on the orders of the "gentleman" pig Winston Churchill .

It is only through the incredible perseverance of Kemal at the temerity of his troops and fears about a Bolshevization Anatolia the Treaty of Sevres was canceled and the Treaty of Lausanne ( July 1923) reinstating the Turks in their right was wrested from the Allies .

Mehmet VI, shame, fled in November 1922 . That's what he had better things to do. In

October 1923, the Kemalist made their entrance to Istanbul . The Republic of Turkey was born.


Young-Turkism and Kemalism

The reforms of the Young Turks were primer Kemalist reforms: secularization, state interventionism, economic Turkification.

However, the Kemalism stands of young-Turkism on several points, moreover important:
- it is a nation-state compressing, due to adaptation to new circumstances (loss of Ottoman possessions, close proximity with the formidable USSR ) on Anatolian space and adopting a neutralism pragmatic: he does not want to lose what he dearly purchased by the Treaty of Lausanne , he also condemns the adventurous foreign policy of the Young Turks focusing on pan-Islamism and Turkism (ideologues joined in Kemalism as Ziya Gökalp, Yusuf Alp Tekin Akçura and / Armed Tekinalp had quit Turkism)
- he is less inclined to intellectual speculation, he focused on more mundane but necessary objectives of development internal , with less emphasis revolutionary
- it looks more purified forms the Islam and the State run, opposing both the ulema and fraternities as a whole (he sees as religious forms backward slowed the march of progress towards the Turks) and drawing a line under the old Ottoman institutions , while the Young Turks were close Mevlevi and Bektash , and have never had the intention to abolish the sultanate and caliphate;
- the militaristic character of power is also displayed less than the Young Turks of the period 1913-1918 : Kemalist political leaders scrupulously wear civilian clothes.


Next Page: Conclusion

Online Ontario Drivers License Templates

Adventure Young Turk: In power

Previous: In Opposition


Part Three: In power


Revolution broke

The July 3, 1908, a military uprising was organized by members of the officers UPC to Monastir and Salonika (Macedonia). Garrison Resna deserted under the command of Major Niyazi Bey , then the battalion Monastir through the young Major Enver Bey took to the bush in the mountains. The soil was favorable: the soldiers were destitute and starving, feeling isolated in the face of terrorism komitacı , worried about rumors of negotiations for the Anglo-Russian partition of Macedonia. The general sent by the Sultan to suppress the revolt was killed on the spot. To the surprise of the latter, sent troops (18,000 men) rallied the insurgents. On July 24 , Abdulhamid II is forced to bow to the claim raised by the Young Turks (who threatened to walk Istanbul on): Restoring 1876 constitution and Parliament .

The event provoked scenes of jubilation, giving rise to a happy hugs among the various Ottoman subjects.


Ottomanism

In November-December 1908 , UPC won elections handily cons Agreement liberal Prince Sabahattin (a political party that was favored by British diplomacy). Despite this victory, had to call the UPC at the government level, with liberal reformers had decided on which to rely, for lack of "better "Abdulhamid II.

Ottomanism The original CUP was no facade. For example, Nicolae Constantin Batzaria , Vlach Macedonian Orthodox, Ottoman became Minister of Public Works in 1913. Brackets, Vlachs and Romanians are Orthodox Balkan surely have had in modern times, the most cordial relations with the Turks, for reasons difficult to establish (although their rivalry with their fellow Slavs are an obvious reason ): Senior officials and scholars Romanian nationalists, however, have often shown a marked respect towards Turks. The

Parliament restored (chaired by Ahmet Rıza ) included: 147 Turks, 60 Arabs, 27 Albanians, 26 Greeks, 14 Armenians, 10 Slavs, Jews 4. A law instituted the conscription of non-Muslims in 1909, the first non-Muslim officers ( Greek, Armenian, Jewish ) were promoted in 1912 . The fact is that the Young Turks have not only incorporated the non-Muslims in the Ottoman army , but has also placed officers in non-Muslim position of superiority over the Muslim soldiers, despite the risks it would induce in conflict with Christian nations. Christian representatives welcomed this very lukewarm military integration: they wanted to ethnically homogenous units, all separate and commanded by Christian officers, we can guess why ... As well explained Dimitri Kitsikis , we can not deny the sincerity and generosity that inspired these reforms Ottomanism connotation: they were so young revolutionaries (many had only their twenties or thirties) and thus somewhat naive. They really believed able to save the empire by the establishment of a community equality of citizens (albeit by methods centralist), a "nation Ottoman " civic unit because they underestimate the significance of the principle of separatist ethnic nationalities among non-Turkish, because the "tyranny" Hamidian the clouded. This naivete is even uncomfortable when we see that they were willing to forgive the crimes of terrorist bloody Dashnak , allowing it to have MPs in Parliament, as if the Dashnaks were respectable only hostile to revolutionary Hamidian absolutism, not the Turks themselves.

1908-1909 were years of intellectual ferment, with a multitude of debates and publications, a remarkable growth of community life, the political police and censorship has been abolished.

But yet there were many shortcomings: Austrian annexation of Bosnia ( September 1908), the continuation of Armenian-Kurdish tensions in eastern Anatolia and bustle of komitacı in Macedonia, and finally a attempted coup fundamentalist.

The cons-fundamentalist revolution of 1909 began with the mutiny 1st Army Corps of Istanbul cons the Young Turks in the night of April 12 to 13 , many Albanian soldiers were involved, as well as officers from the ranks, calling for strict enforcement of the Sharia . The Ôeyh Naksibendi Vahdet and association Mohammedan Union (founded during a meeting at the Ayasofya Mosque, whose newspaper Volkan propaganda was very virulent) were behind. The serious unrest shook Istanbul (sacking of editors of two newspapers Young Turks, the Armenian quarter, Yıldız Palace, killing degreed officer, summary executions of two members) stretched to the provinces, which gave rise to a confusing situation and widespread violence chaotic: for example, hundreds of Armenians were killed in the Adana 14 to 16 April . The UPC
retorted with the 2nd and 3rd Corps of Rumelia , set in motion the night of April 16 to 17 , forming an "action Army ( Hareket Ordusu ) controlled by Mahmut Sevket Pasa (which was not a member of the UPC), assisted Enver and Niyazi Kemal . Istanbul was taken over by the Young Turks April 24, through the participation of volunteers (including Christians). Enver
paid tribute to the men who died for the liberation of Istanbul, before their common grave: the Muslims and non-Muslims. Martial law was proclaimed and the mutineers tried by special courts. It was decided to table Abdulhamid II , suspected, not without reason, to have been involved in the cons-revolution: five members were charged, three Muslims, one Christian and one Jewish (Karasu). It was his brother Mehmet V who succeeded him.

This event began seriously undermined the political moderation hitherto cultivated by the Young Turks, who found themselves obliged to form special battalions to crush the rebel bands. A Adana, many Muslims and Armenians involved in the violence of April were sentenced to death by courts martial.

In addition, the project Ottomanism , when it was on track to achieving policy, found itself facing opposition from various non-Turks : MPs opposed to non-Turkish removing millet (Recognized religious communities) and demanded special status of cultural autonomy. Only decentralization advocated by Sabahattin held in their heart (certainly further weaken the Empire), not the civic egalitarianism itself, which they feared would lead them to be A Turkish. The Young Turks conceived in great bitterness. In response, they forbade political associations ethno-religious ( 1909). The Jacobin centralization cementing the unity of the Ottoman spread of Turkish language in schools and courts was not in itself "Monstrous" or a sign of ethnic intolerance: she was much more sensible from the perspective of the sustainability of the Empire faces pressure from all sides, that decentralization liberal. But non-Turks refused categorically. Accordingly, the Ottomans were hardly tenable.

Defeats recorded during the Italo-Turkish War (1911-1912) in Cyrenaica, Tripolitania and the Albanian nationalist insurgency spring of 1912 (claiming the lives of Niyazi in April 1913) destabilized the UPC (which was focusing his speech on Defence Ottoman territorial integrity): a coup Liberal Anglophile the ousted from power in July 1912 .

The First Balkan War (1912-1913) saw the massive betrayal of the Greek and Bulgarian soldiers just integrated into the Ottoman army. The Serbia, the Greece and Bulgaria (taking advantage of what the Ottoman army was already dealing with Italy and the Albanian insurgents) do not only fought the Ottoman domination in Macedonia but also Islam or rather the presence of Muslims: their design narrow national identity being based on faith (as we have already said), the Serbian army massacred the Muslim Albanian to Shkodra (northern Albania), in Kosovo and Macedonia ( 1912-1913), while the Albania had revolted against the Ottomans (independence proclaimed by Ismail Qemali in November 1912). Among the former Ottoman Balkan, we must highlight the fact that it is only Albanians (mostly Muslim) who did not base their nationalism on confession (Since putting on the same plane Muslims, Orthodox and Catholic). Young Turk civilians deliberately took up arms to defend the Ottoman Macedonia as Talat the muhacir Bulgaria. Loss of Macedonia (definitive May 1913) provoked the arrival of yet another wave of muhacir ( 300,000), whose officers and officials Young Turks and their families who were fleeing killings , rape, maiming and looting armies Orthodox. The Dr. Nazım residing in Salonika, was himself taken prisoner by the Greek army (who invaded the city in November 1912 ) before being released. Obviously, much of the Sephardim of Thessaloniki had no choice but to follow the Turks, given the superstitious pogrom of Orthodox Christians (all those not of their faith were intolerable in their delusional mind ). How could it be otherwise?

On the initiative of Enver and Cemal , arguing that the abandonment of Edirne Bulgarians, a coup was organized in January 1913 : the War Minister Nazım Paşa (to whom he was alleged to be some serious irresponsibility) was shot, and the Grand Vizier Kamil Pasha forced to resign. With this resurgence of the UPC is the military wing and radical right thing, the Committee governing this both directly (but with a grand vizier non-member) does component over the Liberals.

The UPC, on the occasion of discord between the Christian Orthodox, was determined to regain the city of Edirne and Eastern Thrace during the Second Balkan War (June-July 1913) : so was the very security of Istanbul.

Following the assassination of the Grand Vizier Mahmut Sevket Pasha (June 1913), fomented by Liberal , organized opposition was banned. A triumvirate İsmail Enver Paşa together (War Minister), Mehmet Talat Pasha (Minister of Interior) and Ahmet Cemal Pasha (Minister of the Navy) was now firmly the reins of the country. The UPC
long maintained contact with the Dashnak and Greek and Armenian patriarchs , which shows that the abandonment of the line Ottomanism did not happen overnight.

scalded and disappointed Unionists turned gradually and logically to other circles of identification and belonging.


Panislamism

The Young Turks were close Mevlevi Sufi and Bektash (but not Naksibendi ): they seem to have seen currents capable of reviving the Islamic Ottoman . Mevlevi and Bektash helped the Young Turks in their fight against the power Hamidian. The tekke (monasteries) of dervishes served as their meeting places. During the First World War , there was a brigade of volunteers Mevlevi in the Ottoman army , under the command of Ôeyh Veled Çelebi. Unlike Kemalist future (though themselves largely from the Young Turk movement), the Young Turks had nothing against fraternities: many of them, like Talat were Bektashi. The great Sufi mystic was confused with the political ideal of the CUP for dervic hes Young Turk . Moreover, even Şeyhülislam (Grand Mufti) Musa Kazim Efendi was both Bektashi and member of UPC (and Freemason).

They had a new approach to Islamic identity, they left the observation of the need to get out of a sclerotic Ottoman Islam, fatalistic, formalist (since the seventeenth century ), frozen in a grim conservatism, the leaden exercised by the ulema psycho. They wanted Islam to oversee state discharge its archaic obsolete, put in harmony with the rational philosophy of Western Europe and the modern technique. Gökalp and Agayev , concerned about the status of women favored the emancipation of women. The Young Turks were among the first Muslim to grasp the issue of the veil. The Revolution allowed the Muslim feminists to speak, as novelists Halide Edip and guzide Sabri. But they were nevertheless aware of the dissolution of the family unit in the West. Kemal Karpat argued that the Young Turks, including the most secularists as Akçura were not against Islam as such. Even the "moderate Islamist" Bosnian Alija Izetbegovic, in his writings in jail Tito, acknowledged that Gökalp had nothing against Islam itself but only against certain designs "theocratic" and "clerical." For Gökalp , it was not in official Ottoman Islam dull and fussy temperament that expressed the true (idealistic, optimistic, mystic) but in the Turkish popular Sufi Islam . Tekin Alp (apparently more forgiving than the Gökalp ottomanité) had high regard for some Ottoman sultans who demonstrated an open mind, as the conqueror of Constantinople, Mehmet II or reformers Mahmut II and Abdülmecit . As for and Ahmet Mehmet Akif Agayev they were influenced by the Muslim reformism Al-Afghani .

They insisted on the town of Moslemness Turks, Arabs and Kurds . The pan-Islamism originally advocated by Abdulhamid II was recovered by the Young Turks from the Italo-Turkish War (lost), 1911 , where Ottoman military ( Enver Bey ) were see firsthand the combativeness of Libyan Bedouins and the support of the local Sanusi brotherhood . It has gradually strengthened with the Balkan Wars cons-Orthodox Christian armies, then WWI colonial powers against the English and French . He was also a response to articles as protectors of Christians in East claimed that the Tsar and leaders of the Third French Republic . The journal İslam Mecmuası sensitivity expressed pan-Islamist. Experience Young Turk aroused some interest in the Muslim world, from North Africa to the Indus , so England and France feared revolts pan-Islamists in their colonies, following the proclamation of jihad by Şeyhülislam the Ottoman ( November 1914 ).

They maintained close relations with two grand viziers who have close links with the Arab world: Mahmut Sevket Pasa (a Chechen Baghdad, grand vizier in 1913) and Sait Halim Paşa (small- son of Mehmet Ali Pasha of Egypt, the Grand Vizier in 1913-1916). In a congress in Paris in June 1913 , Mithat Şükrü Bleda (Secretary General of UPC ) and Rafik al-Azim (President of the Decentralization Party ) did a spectacular public reconciliation. Shortly before, Ammunation Iskandar, vice-president of the Arab nationalist group, claimed that the Arab nation does not want to secede from the Ottoman Empire. Sati al- Husri , the intellectual Arab nationalism, supported a time the Young Turks, and remained influenced by Gökalp . Wanting to be closer

Arabs, they had nothing against the assertion of Arabism in the Ottoman Empire. Two laws of March 1913 Arab provinces to confer autonomy and sub-parliamentary budget (provincial parliaments). Evidence that the Young Turk Jacobinism cared not to offend the sensibilities of Arab nationalists . The emphasis was on modern education in the Arab provinces, as well as the development of the press. The outreach effort of the Turkish language in schools has not overshadowed the teaching of Arabic literal. İsmail Hakkı Babanzade , spokesman for the CUP, publicly expressed its commitment to the Arabic language as the liturgical language of Islam.

It Palestine, and it is probably no coincidence that Arab Mashreq were the most loyal vis-à-vis the Ottoman authority. The future Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini (half Circassian), volunteered for the Ottoman army for two years (1914-1916), he even obtained the rank of captain. We should also mention the undying loyalty in the Arabian desert , the Chammari Bedouin tribe, under the rule of the Emir Ibn Rashid .

In the Maghreb, Libyan Ahmad al-Sharif, a great master of Sanusi, helped the Turks by attacking from behind the British in Egypt (the anti-Italian in Libya was supported by the Turkish military until 1919).

The Young Turks have proved much harder in the repression of Zionism qu'Abdülhamit II was confined to a few obstacles (also ineffective) against Jewish immigration to Palestine : Talat (which was probably the Triumvir, which gave the most interest in Mashreq ) projected a moment taken from Jews in Palestine (Jews by bumping muhacir ), non-Ottoman Jews (including David Ben Gurion ) were expelled Palestine at the beginning of the First World War, later Cemal was arrested and executed several agitators Zionists (by shooting and hanging) and deported 9,000 Jews from Jaffa north. We must see this severity Zionist taking account of Arab interests, or even the habit of good Muslims unwilling to abandon Gavur (infidels) a Muslim land that houses the third holiest site of Islam ( mosque al-Aqsa ). The British promised the creation of a "Jewish national home " in Palestine in November 1917 ( statement of Foreign Minister Balfour ), following the steps of the Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann promised in exchange for a campaign of entry into the war U.S. from the organized American Jewry. The English army at war against the Ottoman army consisted of three battalions of Jewish volunteers from the Zionist "Jewish Legion " of Ze'ev Jabotinsky . Before the war, the Zionist project met the since Tsarist Russia allowed him to get rid of "his" Jews and Orthodox Christian religion led him to consider "deicide." If he participated in Zionist Congress in Hamburg (1909), Moiz Kohen / Tekin Alp (then Ottoman) has never advocated the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine but are only defending Jewish immigration into the Ottoman Empire (and not especially in Palestine). Emanuel Karasu has meanwhile expressed his personal hostility to the Zionist project. These are not the Young Turks who collaborated with Zionism but rather bewildered by this Sharif Hussein, their enemy, whose son Faisal signed an agreement with Weizmann in January 1919 : the Hashemite family and conceded the right the existence of a Jewish state in Palestine alongside a great Arab kingdom (which obviously never saw the day). The Palestinians, who are victims of Zionist violence since 1921, may "thank" deficient Hashemite for their "vision". Rather than sullying the names of the Young Turk triumvirate (what other government has managed Palestine has historically acted as hard against Zionism?), Some conspiracy theorists would do well to consider the game of underworld Party Decentralization who had contacts with the World Zionist Organization since 1913 and who eventually betray its commitments to the Porte during the war (in collusion with the French in Syria). It although "beautiful" to insult all goes, it is still necessary to have concrete evidence to put in the balance.

Moreover, the nationalist Lebanese Maronites, as fetid Gemayel clan (well known to have caused such harm to Muslims of the Levant), have also fought against the Ottomans. In

Syria, Cemal has run Arab nationalists because their activity was anti-Ottoman and in collusion with France, as was proven in documents seized from French consulates in Damascus and Beirut.

The Young Turks (some of them were of Kurdish origin, remember) led the first ethnological research on the Kurds . They sought to discipline the Kurdish militias Hamidiye formed under Abdulhamid II and integrate them into the regular army, which was not an easy task.


Turkism

The Turkishness ( türklük ) in the writings and speeches of the Young Turks was a linguistic and cultural concept. Ziya Gökalp defined membership in the national community as belonging to the Turkish language, culture and education to integrate with society. He contrasted the high culture / classical Ottoman (which he exaggerated the nature Byzantine-Arab-Persian) to the folkloric culture Turkish Anatolia (which he underestimated the size pre-Anatolian Greek). Racial considerations (in the biological sense of the term) were unrelated to the Young Turks, who were yet receptive to ideas circulating in Europe and then Darwinian scientist: the whims of measuring skulls brachycephaly not arrive in Turkey in the 20s -30 (under the influence of the European raciology). The Young Turks were Istanbulites, Turkomans of the Balkans, Albanians, Circassians, Kurds, Turks, Eastern (Tatars, Azeris). Enver Pasa himself had both origins Gagauz (Turkish so) and Circassian. If they had come to speak of Turks as a "race" (as Ernest Renan spoke of "Indo-European" and "Semitic race"), it is certainly not a "purebred "They were perfectly aware, because of their different backgrounds, that people belonging to the Turkic world wide had a wide variety of physical types, despite the continuity of traits" turanism "again perceptible here and there (almond-shaped eyes), explainable by the large absorption capacities Turkic , agglomeration early nomadic tribes non-Turkish (Mongolian, Indo-European Ugric) hordiques in coalitions, the Turkization process (of Indo-European Central Asian, Caucasian, Anatolian, Mesopotamian, Balkan, a process that is preposterous to attribute to the harem elitist or devsirme ), their age-old imperial tradition of openness and ethnic mix, the attractiveness of their agglutinative language.

For them, the relationship between Turks Anatolia and of the East ( Caucasus, Crimea, Volga, Central Asia ) was based on language and folk traditions. They sought to serve the Turkish-Ottoman a language reform to be closer to other Turks. They spoke in magazines Türk Genç Yurdu and Kalemli through a Turkic language purged and simplified, understandable to the Turks in the East.

The Turks were in arrears compared to non-Turks ( Greeks, Bulgarians, Armenians, Albanians, Arabs ) in a spirit of cohesion and community support networks. The Turkish nationalism was very low before the Albanian nationalist uprising of 1912 and Balkan Wars (1912-1913). The recovery of Edirne and Eastern Thrace by the Ottoman army in July 1913 , during the Second Balkan War , enhanced the prestige of the military fringe UPC and feeling excited the Turkish Nationalist. The conflagrations of wars electrified this nationalism.

Where the interests of management, integration and mobilization of the masses: meetings, calls to boycott foreign products. Paramilitary organizations (Like Türk Gücü ) emerged, the youth was brigaded by German concept of "nation in arms". In 1914-1918 , Gökalp lyrically extolled the martial qualities of the Turkish soldier in his poems.

Turkish nationalism amount had an economic component: the desire to create a national economy (Milli İktisat ), an economic elite Muslim place of those Christians and Jews. Concretely, this has led by example to encourage producers Muslims priority access to state orders. Akçura was well placed (son of Tatar industrial) to see if non-Turks controlled the strategic sectors (trade and industry in its infancy) of the Ottoman economy, it was not at all because of a lack of skills Turks but tolerance unheard of Ottoman system. The

Turkism is originally a response to Panslavism and policy of Russification initiated by Tsar Alexander III (but also, to a lesser extent, an imitation of panhellenism of Enosis irredentism and Romanian populations around Vlachs). Activities intellectual Turkist grew after the Revolution of 1908: the association Türk Dernegi (founded in 1909 ), the journal Türk Yurdu ( 1911), the home club / Türk Ocagi ( 1912 ). Initially, this Turkism was primarily cultural in nature and was within the turcologie simple: there was no racism, at least in the negative sense (one Armenian also included among the founders of the Türk Dernegi : Dr. Agop Boyacıyan ). In the literary magazine Kalemli Genç, Ziya Gökalp and Mehmet Emin celebrated poems in their Turkish roots-steppe, old Turkish-Mongol conquerors, the Turan . The Turkism be politicized under the influence of Turkish immigrants from Russia: Akçura Yusuf defended a Turkish political nationalism oriented pan-Turkic soon 1903-1904, being very skeptical about the sustainability of multi-ethnic empires. The Tatar and Azeri Turkism were against the repressive tsarist Russophobes but no: they do not hide in the journal Türk Yurdu , a form of respect for Russian culture and were aware that Russian society (as later Soviet society) allowed Turks Kazan and Baku access to certain educational and economic progress, as well as the intellectual ferment of Western Europe. Ziya Gökalp and Tekin Alp (neither were Turkish sense most ethnically narrow term, which demonstrates the non-racist Turkism) envisagèrent unification of Turkic-speaking territories at the time of military conflict with Russia. It is in the fear of loss of possessions North African, Balkan and Middle Eastern that the ideal Turkism became louder and louder: Eastern Turkic appearing as a field of expansion and promising compensation. The

Georgian Legion was founded on the initiative of the German diplomat Friedrich Werner von der Schulenburg in 1915 and incorporated into the Ottoman army (in response to the formation of Armenian volunteer units within the army Russian). Composed of prisoners of war Georgian and North Caucasian Muslim Lazes and it is indirectly related to the project Turkism (junction with the Turkic-speaking areas Caucasus ). In

1918, the Ottoman army commanded by Halil Paşa and Nuri Pasha (respectively uncle and brother of Enver ), turning away somewhat from the Middle Eastern front ( Baghdad and Jerusalem being lost 1917), pushed to the north-west Persia and Baku, in Azeri areas / Turkish-Oghuz.

Moreover, Turanianism (awareness of a Ural-Altaic family) was apparently not there quite absent from the alliance of the Central Powers : the Hungarians within the Austrian Army, the Finnish Rifle Battalion led by the Germans. The

Turkism and Turkism were not ultimately the last born of Spring Peoples that shook Europe, they shall be returned to its historic surroundings.


Impact of Reform

The stock of reforms implemented or attempted by the Young Turks is far from being inconsistent.

At the municipal level: attempt to establish democratic municipal institutions, reorganization of the municipal government of Istanbul , improvement infrastructure and utilities in the city (garbage collection, sewers, fire prevention).

On the land issue: establishment of a system of demarcation and land registration and estimation of their value and income, agrarian reform project.

On economic development: industry development, national economic activities, nationalization, creation of protectionist tariffs for domestic production, encouraging the consumption of local products, development of technical schools.

On the social question: creation of cooperatives of producers and consumers, a national bank credit , measures apparently inspired by the non-Marxist socialism (Proudhon?).

On teaching: development of the school system.

On secularism: secularization of education and justice.

On the Status of Women: certain emancipation of women, with their massive entry into working life during the First World War .

These bold reforms have clearly helped the emergence of a state, economy and society modern Turkish.


The choice of the alliance with Germany

In April 1914, the Ottoman government signed an agreement with Paris : in exchange for a loan, an increase of customs duties and a promise to review capitulations, the France won important concessions on the railways and ports in Syria, as well as new trade privileges. It was much to the disadvantage of the Turks (the French press made no mistake in fact not talking about a division of the Empire into spheres of influence) UPC but believed he had secured his rear by guarantees on the side of France.

Public opinion and a good part of the Young Turks favored the Entente , mainly sentimental Francophilia. Enver , because of his experience as military attache in Berlin was very impressed by the militarism of the IInd Reich and his technical prowess (which is more, the Germany does not colonized Muslim lands). Talat and Cemal were rather turned to France and England . After sounding

France, the Young Turks finally saw in the Ottoman-German alliance (Treaty of Alliance signed secretly August 1914) the best way to get rid of the weight of the chains of semi-colonial Capitulations (repealed in September ) and the Public Debt, and also to counter the Czarist Russia, which was considered the enemy and immediate priority. In February 1914 , they had to accept, under international pressure, a reform plan initiated by the Armenian Russia, which provided for the appointment of general inspectors powerful foreigners in eastern Anatolia . Their apprehension about the Russians tenfold.

is why they accepted the entry of German officers in the army command Ottoman : Field Marshal Colmar von der Goltz (commander on the Mesopotamian front), General Otto Liman von Sanders (commander of the 1st Army Corps in Istanbul and at the Battle of Gallipoli), General Friedrich Kress von Kressenstein (commander during the battle for control of Suez and in the defense of Palestine). The government

Ottoman was eager for battle, to settle accounts with Russia (war started with it in October), the rush was tragically awkward. Kemal , advocating a cautious realpolitik, also much criticized Enver , whom he accused of getting lost in reveries of reckless and risky. Without doubt he would have been better to remain neutral in effect, allow the Tsarist regime rotten (then led by the simpleton Nicolas II) as a rotten fruit falls under the blows of the war to extend the influence of Ottoman Muslims East. Enver (who had Circassian origins, detail which is important) led a disastrous offensive to regain Kars during the winter of 1914-1915 .


Turks struggle for survival of the Empire

By secret Sykes-Picot agreement, Sazonov (May 1916), the Entente powers preparing the dismemberment of the Empire: the England would have Mesopotamia and Palestine, the France the Syria and Lebanon, the Russia the eastern Anatolia and the Straits . The Ottoman government, which was well suspecting the existence of such agreements, has heard through of Russian Bolshevik in January 1918 .

Despite their precarious living conditions, despite the Armenian terrorist fifth columns (on which we will return), the Turkish soldiers made no defect in battle they fought very bravely and selflessly quite admirable (in this sense, the poems glorifying the Gökalp are very far from laughable) alongside their German brothers in arms:
- in February 1915 , Cemal just missed to capture the channel Suez ;
- in August 1915 , Van was taken (to be lost again the following month);
- in December 1915, Mustafa Kemal Paşa routed the Anglo-French in Gallipoli after a long resistance.

The problem was not to look at the Turkish soldier who performed his duty admirably. The problem was the stab in the back planted by an idiot full, less than nothing, without any personal merit, cowardly advantage of his position.


Betrayal Hashemite

Indeed, Hussein, the Hashemite Sharif Hejaz was stupid enough to believe in the Letters and honeyed words of British High Commissioner Henry McMahon and agent TE Lawrence (for information, a degenerate homosexual masochistic tendencies who claimed to have been raped by Turks, probably a sordid fantasies of what bad ass) on a large Arab kingdom under his rule: it is because of this ambition Hussein promoted the "Arab Revolt " against the Turks in June 1916 . Yet the Turks had tried to be conciliatory with the Hashemite family in 1912 by naming Abdullah and Faisal two son of Hussein, deputies in the Ottoman Parliament. The attitude of Hashemites did nothing heroic, contrary to what people want to believe the images d'Epinal Hollywood: being attacked by their Bedouin , while knowing that supported by the British, the path Hejaz railway which was guarded in part by poor Circassians already supporting evil climate of the Arabian desert was within the lowest cowardice of a bunch of pseudo-empaffé computers (remember that it is an "illustrious" heir This clique historically very compromised with the interests Anglo-Zionist, an insignificant dwarf, who massacred Palestinians in 1970). No, it is not very glorious. The Hashemite treason was condemned by a fatwa common several muftis Syrian and Palestinian . Ironically, the Wahhabi Ibn Saud (who had played a minor role in the "Arab Revolt") chase Hussein of Mecca and conquer the Hejaz in the 20s: a cold slap administered to senile fool and despicable.


Return of Armenian terrorism and Russian advance

leaders Dashnak promised the Congress of Erzurum in July 1914 they do not betray the Ottomans for the Russians. Member since dubious promise of Erzurum the Ottoman Parliament , Karekin Pasdermadjian, said Garo Armen, officer leading the Dashnak, rallied the Russian army at the outbreak of hostilities. It was imitated by many Armenian soldiers who deserted en masse with their weapons in hand. In February 1915 , the Bulgarian section of Dashnak offered his collaboration British War Office: their plan was the creation of units Armenian volunteer to take over the Cilicia. As for Hintchak , he took up a position abroad against the Ottomans. From the summer of 1914 , an Armenian revolt had shed blood to Zeytun . In April 1915 in the city of Van , a local Armenian under the direction of Aram Manougian (Leader of Dashnak Van) revolted, took control of the city and began cleaning Muslims (Turks and Kurds) by killing, killings continued with the occupation of the city by the Russians the following month. Elsewhere, Fedai (guerrillas) Armenian armed bands whose had formed and led attacks from 1914, multiplied the massacres against Muslims in 1915-1916 before and thanks to the Russian advance ( battalions of Armenian volunteers including Anatolian Armenians as General Andranik former Dashnak Ozanian , joining them) in other provinces of eastern Anatolia (but also in villages in the region Van ): Erzurum, Mus, Bitlis, Trabzon . In sum, it was back in bloody terrorism Armenian Hamidian period, this time in a time of world war ...

Faced with this situation very alarming that the Ottoman government decided on April 24, 1915 the arrest of 2,000 persons of the movement Dashnak-Hintchak physical and neutralization of some of them : coercion very late (6 months after entry into the war), too late, one might even say. The Young Turks had finally decided not to take them with kid gloves. Their "soft" illusions were selected previously treated as they deserved these committee men Armenians, they had left strutting for years in the capital. The "party" was over.

The Assyrian-Chaldeans also rallied the Russian army and he served as scouts. According to Salah Jmor they were, as the Armenians , involved in mass killings of Muslims.

The Russian army massacred en masse civilians Lazes and Adjara in Batumi region (annihilation of almost all the Muslim inhabitants of the valley Tchorotkhi ). According to George Mamoulia , Moscow planned settlement areas Anatolian occupied by the installation of Cossacks: Armenian the secessionism was nothing but a weapon in the hands of the expansionist mill Bear. Note that January 1913, the Russian government called the Ottoman government did not install muhacir Balkan provinces of eastern Anatolia but Mesopotamia, we understand what his intentions .. . A private letter of to Talat Enver ( May 2, 1915) tells us that the Russians had decided on April 20, 1915 continue to expel Muslims (the Kurds Caucasus ?) sent in Anatolia. The fighting has depopulated areas, insecurity prompting villagers to flee (to the side Muslim Ottoman Armenians to the Russian side).


War demographic

From 1913, the Ottoman government (noting the betrayal of Orthodox Christian soldiers and the final triumph of the stato- nationalism in the Balkans) had finally resolved to organize a political demographic remodeling the Anatolia . After the massive and continuous flow muhacir previous decades (at that moment that roughly one-way), we must mention the novelty of population exchanges. the Bulgarian-Ottoman treaty in September 1913 organized a Christian Bulgarian population exchange (their vicinity, Thrace, with the city of Istanbul worried) and Muslim. The Greek-Ottoman treaty May 1914 also provided such an exchange. the stato-nationalist-Orthodox Christians (Serbian, Greek and Bulgarian) these so-called liberators, even proceeded to exchange of populations between them: with Treaty of Bucharest of August 1913 (ie before the Bulgarian-Ottoman treaty) on Macedonia (divided between Serbia, Greece and Bulgaria), and later the Greco-Bulgarian November 1919. Until the First World War , the Young Turks hoped that the Armenians be held still, and therefore such a population policy would be no need for them: this was not the case, as noted above.
In May 1915
, the transfer of Armenians central and eastern Anatolia (not those of Istanbul, to Izmir and Edirne ) to Syria (Armenian native of ' Aleppo were not either transferred) and Mesopotamia was decided, following insurgency in the city of Van (April). The May 23, by a secret note to sub-prefects Urfa and Zor ( Syria) and the governor of Mosul ( Mesopotamia), the Ministry of Interior gave instructions to officials to ensure a correct reception of displaced Armenians (security of property, supplies). On September 5, 1915 , Talat ordered the governor of Aleppo to ensure supply and protection of displaced Armenians to relocate. Fuat Dündar looked insufficiently still in our view, the question of the categories exempted from the transfer of Armenians: the families of soldiers (unarmed and used in "labor battalions " responsible for road works and Transport, Mr. Dündar does not credit the allegation that the Armenian soldiers were systematically executed after disarmament), artisans, Catholic or Protestant, or even newly converted to Islam were exempted. Mr. Dündar suggests that the vision of the Ottoman government, there was a category of Armenians "loyalists" (military, police). It would thus be a population policy aimed at distract and relocate the Armenian population of central and eastern Anatolia (we shall see its population level for at Muslim), but not to exterminate them (even if there is no doubt that Syria and even more Mesopotamia were semi-desert more inhospitable than the Anatolia). The France, Britain and Russia traditionally so attentive to the Armenian question, the Ottoman government threatened legal action. of the Christian Greek Aegean coast were also displaced, but to within Anatolia .

900,000 Armenians were transferred to the southern Anatolia, the Syria and Mesopotamia after the "Black Book" published by Talat Murat Bardakci : among these, 500,000 were still alive in Syria (Mesopotamia therefore excluded) in February 1916 d According to correspondence JB Jackson (the American consul in Aleppo ) with Henry Morgenthau (U.S. Ambassador to Istanbul ). Note that the Ottoman government did not obstruct humanitarian aid to displaced Armenians, it is as the Consul Jackson was able to observe long the situation in Syria. Regarding casualties, we must take into account emigration Armenian to the West and Russia before the war (300,000 emigrants leaving the Ottoman Empire in all of 1878 to 1914, mostly Christians) and the number of those who have followed the decline Russians during the war ( of hundreds of thousands to Van and other provinces of eastern Anatolia ), and finally those who emigrated after the war (those who took refuge in the Caucasus after the fall of the Armenian Republic in 1920 those who fled to the Levant after the French evacuation of Cilicia in 1921 , etc..). In addition, there are those who died during the winter murderer of 1918-1919 (famine and epidemic typhus), among others. Therefore, the figure of 1, 5 million Armenians "exterminated" (while the total number of Armenians in the Empire before the war did not exceed 1.7 million , according to work Justin McCarthy and Kemal Karpat ) recited by Armenian circles could not be more ridiculous, especially since they also claim that Abdülhamit II (he was surrounded by Darling Armenian!) Would have killed 200,000 to 300,000 alone 1895-1896 (!), And the Young Turks have killed 30,000 to in Adana 1909 (at a time when they had not even taken control of the center of power (!)). We see how outrageous ramblings spiral mired Armenians.

A lamentable carelessness prevailed in the dying Ottoman Empire: famines, epidemics, poverty to bad weather, logistical inadequacies, developmental delay screaming. We have already reported the mortality rate high that struck the Muslim population under Abdulhamid II. In a few years in power, the Young Turks could not hardly deal with this general problem. The soldiers were still underpaid and underfed. Also, all these faults have increased with global conflict (because of the naval blockade Anglo-French, for example), which partly explain the deaths of many Armenians (like that of other Muslims). Erik Jan Zürcher and Fuat Dündar have effectively linked the deportation of Armenians in the dramatic question of muhacir . The Circassians / Circassians dominated the officers Special Organization ( Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa created, drawing on methods of komitacı during the Second Balkan War ), efficient and ultra-violent, responsible to carry out subversive actions (agitprop, espionage, targeted liquidations, sabotage) behind enemy lines (they do not seem to have played a role in the deportation of the Armenians): they must have thought no longer have anything to lose. Similarly, there are many muhacir (from Bulgaria , the North Caucasus ) among architects the deportation of Armenians. In the Muslim atrocities against Armenians, must be part of the heinous crimes of military / police miserable revenge massacres committed by irregulars (Local Kurdish ) marked by the violence of the Armenian and Fedai by muhacir traumatized ( circus). The convoys of Armenians were often the targets of robbers Kurdish tribal areas they passed through. We now know, in the current state of knowledge, there were 1,397 cases of convictions (including death sentences) agents by Ottoman justice Ottoman because of atrocities on Armenians who are liable. The American consul Leslie A. Davis testified that there are 233 court martial filed against Ottoman officials accused of such acts in the region Harput (one wonders if such trials existed among opponents of the Ottomans, including Russians). This is consistent with the posthumous memoirs of Talat, in which he claimed not to have taken punitive measures against perpetrators of systematic atrocities, in a time of war especially cruel and monopolizing resources where they were misunderstood by a Muslim population harassed, but he did what he could. The mentality of

Armenians and Eastern Christians in general ( Maronites, Assyrians, Chaldeans, etc. .) Is not well known in the West where these abound in the diaspora "society" (more or businessmen less mafia, acrobats of Show Business , pseudo "experts", politicos, etc..), and are thus able to incorporate their disinformation influential lobbies: we readily believe their long litany indecent (characteristics of communities culturally uncouth but specializing in trade, if not in outright usury) is sympathetic listening to their endless whining and primary, one pities the ugly faces in front of their priests tacky and primitive, losing sight of that these are just exaggerations of "Oriental" when all they are customary rude (the difference between fantasy and reality is it also very clear in their minds?). Proponents of reverse adversarial, not capable of the least tolerance, perceiving themselves as untouchables (probably because of some obscure reason superstitious), mercilessly self-victimize the Christians of the East do not recognize the extent of killing their own (thanks to outside support, often because deceit is a feature of their nature "Levantine") against the Muslims. Transfer the Armenians to the east, by letting them cross the perilous front lines Russo-Ottoman, would have strengthened the Armenian element in the Caucasus and thus intensified the plight of poor Azeris. Transfer to the South, however, expanded the proportion of Christians in the Levant , and thus indirectly contributed to the great massacres of Muslims (Palestinian, Druze, etc..) In the Lebanon for years 70 and 80 (the Armenian Dashnaks argued Gemayel's Phalange politically when they have not participated in fighting alongside the militia Maronites). We can understand some Arab resentment vis-a-vis the Young Turks. The slaughter of 1914-1918 has killed 2.5 or 3 million Muslims in Anatolia region, one of the world most devastated by this conflict. In the Anatolian territories subject to a time the Russian occupation, a significant decrease in the number of Muslims has been noted, as pointed out by Paul Dumont : leaks and massacres are the cause.

700,000 Turks were also forcibly displaced because of the Russian advance from the "notebook" Talat . In the context of the loss of Macedonia (dear to the heart of the Unionists), a Settlement Act of muhacir was promulgated on May 13, 1913 and a directorate specifically responsible for this installation creates. In a Anatolia which was for decades the receptacle Muslim refugee populations (which could not be without consequences for the regions concentrations of Christians as the Aegean coast and eastern Anatolia ), who was finally caught between the pincers of a vise, the Unionists have set up the goal of forging a block A Turkish Muslim compact and homogeneous policy transfer and installation. Design "criminal"? No, not at all. They had simply accepted the "lesson" of the plight of Muslims Balkans and Caucasus fragmented and scattered. Thus, within 5 years (1913-1918 ) of Kurds, Turkoman and nomadic muhacir "Georgian" (Ajaria) were moved from east to west, muhacir Turkoman, Slavic and Albanian from west to east, muhacir Caucasians (Circassians, Chechens) from Syria and even Syrian Arab families from South to North (a major reason for the success of the "Arab Revolt " in Syria, not to mention that the Syrians had just enjoy being overwhelmed by Armenians), and Libyan refugees who fled the Italian conquest. If there is evidence that the Young Turks did not feed on racial bias against various Muslims in the region (and because, given their own diverse backgrounds). Only the installation of Muslim Gypsies Balkan has been reluctant, but probably for reasons quite other than "racial." Jacobins (by definition fundamentally different ethno-nationalist type völkisch ) and Muslims, they sought to break the particularities ethno-linguistic, tribal, clan among Muslims of Anatolia , allowing them to unite in a common national identity. They took the lead against the "divide and rule" of the colonialists. It was demographically secure Anatolian territory, leaving no outlet for scrubbers irredentist Greek and Armenian colonial powers supporting them: the victory of the latter would have meant a new purge anti-Muslim, in line with those of the Balkans and Caucasus . The reduced Anatolian was last bastion of the Turks : there was a battle that we should absolutely not lose. This Jacobinism was far from being an innovation peculiar to Turkish unionists in the region, we must insist on this fact: Arvanites (Albanians) and were Hellenized Vlachs in Greece, as well as Tzintzars (local Vlachs) were Serbianization in Serbia, it was Christian-orthodox populations considered assimilated by these stato-nationalist (in contrast to Muslim populations hunted ) . Over a third of the total Muslim population of Anatolia was moved by Fuat Dündar . The muhacir could be diluted even more in the mass of the Turkish population they were rejected because their homes by Muslims and Christians executioners calling them "Turks".


Objective: In Baku

1917, the February Revolution overthrew the Tsarist regime . With the October Revolution , the Bolsheviks overthrew turn the government of Kerensky (which was foolishly supported the continuation of the war alongside the Entente ). The Bolshevik government signed an armistice with the Central Powers in December . In March 1918 , the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk Kars-Ardahan restored the Turks. It seemed then we could, in Istanbul, to recover hope about the outcome of the war.

The Russian army had decomposed in the Caucasus, so there was an opportunity to fill the void left. With its oil and its port on the Caspian Sea , the city of Baku offered a great wealth and openness Central Asia. The Army of Islam ( Kafkas İslam Ordusu ) ordered by Nuri Pasha , brother of Enver , penetrated into the Caucasus in 1918 and assist the Nationalist Party Mehmet Emin Azeri Müsavat Resulzade (based Ganja, which was the capital of first independent Republic of Azerbaijan , proclaimed in May ).

Nuri invests in Baku in September . The Muslims of Baku (the Azeris were less well armed than the Armenians and Russian settlers in the Caucasus, and subjected to the distrust of local Bolshevik ) had been victims (again ) of massacres committed by Armenians in March-April 1918 : Baku was then headed by a Soviet bolcho Menshevik-chaired by the Armenian Stepan Shahumyan and stroking in the direction of the bloody coat Dashnaks (distribution of weapons). Azeris réservèrent be an excellent host to the soldiers of Nuri Pasha.

Visiting Berlin, Talat refine projects Muslim states in the Caucasus and Central Asia within a sphere of Turkish influence. But Turkish and German interests diverged in the Caucasus. That's why the march of the Army of Islam had been limited to Baku. the Germans had secretly agreed with the Russian Bolsheviks to oppose what the Baku oil falls into the hands of Turks, Germans, cajoling the Georgian nationalists, had denied that the Army of Islam through the Georgia . As for English who had landed in the city during the summer and had decamped to the arrival of the Turks, they also saw the Turkish advance eastward of a very evil eye.


Armistice Moudros

The Young Turks soon became disillusioned with the victory English Sanora especially the armistice signed by Bulgaria in September . The evacuation of Turkish Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo (October) before the outbreak of the Anglo-Hashemite forces made the inevitable armistice. The triumvirate of leaders lost their power and fled to Istanbul in a German submarine.

With the agreement of Sultan Mehmet VI , the Armistice was signed Moudros by a new government composed of liberal .


Next page: Latest fighting

Fake Braces For Halloween For Sale Sacramento

Adventure Young Turk: In Opposition

Previous: The context of their appearance


Part Two: In Opposition


Foundation Committee of Union and Progress

The Union Committee Ottoman ( İttihat-ı Osmani cemiyet ) nucleus of the future Committee of Union and Progress ( İttihat ve Terakki cemiyet ), was founded in School of Medicine Istanbul Military in 1889 by four students: İbrahim Temo (Albanian), Mehmet Resit (Circassian) Abdullah Cevdet and Ishak Sukuta (Kurds). The basic objective was the return the Constitution of 1876 . The same year, Ahmet Rıza was Paris, on the occasion of the celebrations for the centenary of the French Revolution .

In the 1890s, the company secret Committee of Union and Progress (name inspired by the motto of the positivist Auguste Comte : "Order and Progress" ) was formed from the encounter between the Ottoman Committee of Union and a nebula of exiles "Parisian" about Riza. In

1895 with the publication of the newspaper Meşveret , The Young Turks ( Jön Türkler or Genç Türkler ) CUP embarked on a more committed opposition against the regime Hamidian by clandestine conspiratorial activity. The Committee

Ottoman Liberty, founded in Salonika in 1906 and composed of men of experience (staff, officers), merged with the UPC (originally founded by students and exiles) in 1907. The UPC was now organized into an efficient network of revolutionary cells, modeled on the Italian Carbonari .


The composition of the movement

The structure of the Young Turk movement was an emerging educated middle class: teachers, officers, doctors, lawyers, journalists, students. Many had experienced exile or prison because of their opposition to power Hamidian. The movement of the UPC was a civilian wing and a military wing.

Among civilians, there were:

Senior politicians of the CUP (Central Committee members): the founder Ahmet Rıza ( Turkish Istanbul, agronomist), Drs Nazım Bey of Macedonia and Bahattin Şakir Bey of Bulgaria (Turkish doctors ) Mithat Şükrü Bleda ( Turkish Macedonia, Secretary General of UPC), Mehmet Talat ( muhacir Turkish Bulgaria , postal worker).

Intellectuals:
- Original zaza (an Iranian ethnic group of eastern Anatolia separate Kurdish): Mehmet Ziya / Ziya Gökalp ( of Diyarbakir sociologist)
- Kurdish origin : Abdullah Cevdet (of Arapkir ) Sait Nursi ( of Bitlis )
- Albanian origin : Mehmet Akif Ersoy ;
- Turks of the Russian Empire emigrants in the Ottoman Empire: Yusuf Akçura (Kazan Tatar ) Halim Sabit (Kazan Tatar ) Ahmet Agayev / Ağaoğlu ( Azeri Karabakh ) Ali Hüseyinzade ( Azeri Baku ).
There were artists like the poet Mehmet Emin Yurdakul ( Turkish Istanbul ) or novelist Ömer Seyfettin (Anglais de la côte égéenne ), Ziya Gokalp Mehmet Akif et également des poèmes écrivaient.

Parme les militaires: Ismail Enver Bey ( gagaouzes origines et circassiennes islamisées ), Jamal Ahmed Bey (Anglais de l'île de Lesbos ), Ahmed Niyazi Bey (also Resen Albanais ), Eyup Sabri Bey ( Albanais d'Ohrid), Omar Naji (Anglais d'Istanbul), Mustafa Kemal ( de Macédoine Turcoman Nomad). Parme les civils (Talaat, Gökalp etc..), many had been educated in military schools.

All names cited above are those of Muslims from birth.

The cosmopolitan atmosphere of the seaside town of Salonika , due to the strong Jewish presence, has no doubt played a role in the fermentation of ideas of the Young Turks, in that it allowed them an opening the outside world. There were few Jews among the Young Turks: Emanuel Karasu (Salonica Sephardic member belonging to the moderate fringe of the UPC) and the ideologue Moiz Kohen / Tekin Alp (Sephardic Will of ). Moiz Kohen, first Ottomanism, became a convinced adherent of Turkish nationalism, and nothing in his work and his career does any duplicity. His case is somewhat comparable to that of some Eastern Christians who are totally invested in Arab nationalism (in this case the Baath): he took the name of Alp Tekin, presumably in homage to Alp Tekin , the founder of the dynasty of Turkish Ghaznavids as the Assyrian Mikhail Johanna took the name of Tarek Aziz in homage to Arab-Berber conqueror Tariq ibn Ziyad. This should be a commonplace to note that there have been Jewish or half-Jews in most contemporary political movements: Croatian nationalism ( Josip Frank, Vladimir Sachs, Nenad Porges, Andrija Hebrang, Davor Stern, Slobodan Lang, Mladen Schwartz ), Italian Fascism ( Guido Jung, Isaia Levi Ettore Ovazza, Ugo Ancona Maggiorino Ferraris, Achille Loria ), Arab nationalism ( James Sanua Egypt, Albert Bessis and Andre Barouch Tunisia), etc.. Moreover, one can even find a Jew among Wahhabis: alias Muhammad Asad Leopold Weiss . But there is so much "fun" seems to treat the Turks as "lackeys of the Jews stupid." The Young Turks were strongly opposed to Zionism, from the moment it became clear that the objective (non-admitted initially) this movement was the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine going against the territorial integrity of Ottoman Empire. It is the British war propaganda (encountering the fundamentalist Muslims) to the attention of the Arabs who spread this idea still very widespread "Judeo-mason conspiracy" while the vast majority of executives Young Turks were Muslims specifically aware of the filthy Christian violence against fellow Muslims, often intimately affected by them (Families), so it's extremely insulting to summarize an association of puppeteers Jews. Erik Jan Zürich highlighted the fact that a large part of the Young Turks came from outlying areas and colorful of the Ottoman Empire ( Balkans, Eastern Anatolia ), and they were very concerned with issues of identity. If the Young Turks were the product of a "Jewish conspiracy" (see the speech conspiracy by Muslim fundamentalists and Christians), then this would be true leaders IInd Reich, since a Jewish revolutionary from Russia (Alexander Parvus alias Israel Gelfand Lazarevich ) was charged by the Wilhelmstrasse spread leaflets in support of the Young Turks in Istanbul. In sum, an ineptitude on the part of eccentric circles. Wilhelm II, who had yet Judeophobe trends, himself had Jews in his entourage, such as Albert Ballin and industrial Walther Rathenau . One can also mention the many Jewish officers of the Austro-Hungarian army . As for

Donmez (which are not "crypto-Jews," as many ignorant the oath, but hybrids Judeo-Muslim perfectly identifiable as a heretical sect), apart from the finance minister Mehmet Cavit Bey , they have also played a very minor role.

addition to Jews and Donmez, we must mention the presence of other non-Muslims in the Young Turk movement: the Wallachian Nicolae Constantin Batzaria and Bulgarian Nikola Manolov (Members of CUP), the Peter Armenian Anmeghian and Maronite Ghanim Khalil (important contributors to the press Young Turk), etc..

On the question of Freemasonry , membership of the lodges did not affect all Young Turks (Ahmet Rıza was not a mason, nor Dr. Nazım, for examples). The Young Turks were closer masons masonry radicalized Italian ( Carbonari ) than middle-class Anglo-Saxon masonry, anyway. But as an insider Rudolf von Sebottendorff was well aware that the Turkish masonry was profoundly different from its Western counterpart, she remained faithful to the ancient spirituality. Thierry Zarcone addressed the triple membership of many Young Turks: the UPC , the Masonic lodges and Sufi . Major Muslim personalities of the nineteenth century, few suspected of atheism, as Abd el-Kader or Al-Afghani were members, at least one time, Masonic lodges. The boxes were used as places for secret meetings, nothing more.


The ideas of the Young Turks

The Young Turks were imbued with the principles of the French Revolution , they were informed of the ideas in Western Europe with courses through their knowledge of French language, their stay in Paris, cosmopolitanism Russian revolutionary intelligentsia (for those who were Turks in Kazan or Baku), or indirectly because of the Balkan nationalist agitation (for those who were officers in active in Macedonia). The influence of French thought were particularly strong at home: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Auguste Comte, Ernest Renan, Emile Durkheim, Gustave Le Bon . More secondary German thought, with the idealism of Hegel (matrix function of the state) and the political economy of Friedrich List , also influences. They admired the revolutionary act of Italians Giuseppe Mazzini ( Young Italy, Young Europe) and Giuseppe Garibaldi ( red shirts). Their references, they ADHERED nor collectivist materialism Marx , or the individualism of liberal English and French, but opted for a "third way" made of holism, organicism, of idealism, close to the radical solidarism Leon Bourgeois. They were enthusiasts positivism and sociology (human science while pregnant). For

Ahmet Rıza , only centralism unitary (unionist) could save the Ottoman building, not the liberal decentralization (advocated by the exiled prince Sabahattin , another opponent of Abdulhamid II) forming the bed of the dismemberment of the Empire by the autonomist. Moreover, Rıza saw the Ottoman army the potential of a vanguard revolutionary and patriotic to straighten the Empire face foreign interference. In true patriot Ottoman , Riza was opposed to the line of Prince Sabahattin which was to encourage foreign intervention to compel the Sultan to the implementation of reforms desired. The

Dr. Nazım had penchant for non-Marxist socialism. Fascination for the French Revolution (in particular its tendency Rousseau pre-romantic and Jacobin), attraction to novelty and progress, confidence in the virtues of science and pedagogy, the desire for change, projects socially progressive reforms, the Young Turks had a size "left." By their romance, excitement and Turkish roots of a distant past, by their sympathy for the folk culture of rural Anatolia, they had a dimension of "right". The reforms enacted from above by the Sultans, sifted suspicious eye of ulema, were not sufficient to meet the Empire had to shake the entire society asleep by a revolutionary fervor. Note that the fascination 1789, including its Jacobin phase ( 1793), was more the norm in the Balkan and Armenian nationalists , although manipulated by regimes who had treatment, c ' is the least we can say, their rhetoric "humanist" (whether Victorian England or autocratic Russia).

Abdullah Cevdet favored a deep imitation of Western Europe, while Mehmet Akif Ersoy was more "Islamist" by its attachment to Muslim values. Akçura Yusuf was among the secularists. Ziya Gökalp trying to reconcile with contemporary, Islamic and Turkishness. All agreed on the need to draw, to some extent at least, Western Europe, especially France Republican and Imperial Germany (especially for those who were officers), less England and the gentry. Ahmet Rıza and others do not, however, confounded the technical superiority of Western Europe with a moral superiority. From the middle class, they had different interests from those of the Muslim landed aristocracy. Tending towards populism, they felt close to the Muslim peasantry of Anatolia, where they saw a living force and honest, and the repository of folk culture eminently respectable. The Young Turks were making fun of "levantinism", that is to say, the mania of Eastern Christians to copy the West in their futility.


Next: In power